Identify the Assumption Critical Reading Problem Gre

GRE Disquisitional Reasoning - Assumption Based Questions

Nosotros accept earlier discussed that in the GRE Verbal Reasoning Section, virtually 50% of the questions would be based on paragraph or passages. In other words, the Reading Comprehension (RC) questions. The mutual RC questions are the questions that examination the test-taker'southward power to understand the overall thought presented in the passage or the ability to interpret the writer'south implicit ideas. But, a sub-variety under this caput are what we call the Critical Reasoning Questions.

Critical Reasoning questions tend to exist commonly the more difficult questions inside a section. They tin can be based on a specific part of a long passage or on the entirety of a very brusque passage. In either case, the questions don't just evaluate the test taker'south power to empathise the passage simply likewise his/her ability to evaluate the writer'south logical structures and question the strength and validity of writer's logic. In the concluding commodity, we have discussed different types of GRE Critical Reasoning questions.  In this weblog, we will solve one assumption based question using the four-footstep strategy.

GRE Disquisitional Reasoning Questions

Question one) In the 1980s l pct of treated diabetic patients lived at least ten years afterwards detection of the illness. Now, 50 per centum live at least xv years after detection. This fact demonstrates that, because of improved methods of handling, diabetic patients now alive longer after they contract the illness than diabetic patients did in the 1980s.

Question Stem:

The conclusion of the in a higher place argument depends on which of the following assumptions?

Options:

In the 1980s only fifty percent of diabetic patients received treatment, whereas now a essentially higher per centum does.

Gratis medical treatment is more likely to exist bachelor now to people who have no wellness insurance than information technology was in the 1980s.

Detection of diabetes does not now take place, on average, significantly before in the progression of the disease than information technology did in the 1980s.

Approach to answer this question:

Pace 1:  Identify the type of question

At this signal in time, I would non be reading the options. That would be an unproductive use of fourth dimension as I would not have any data on what the passage is well-nigh. I merely look at the Question Stem to empathise what multifariousness of question is given. In this specific example, the question is an "Assumption" question. It is asking the states to identify the assumption in the given paragraph.

From this, I would be able to understand that there would be two elements in the given paragraph. A conclusion and some reasons to support that conclusion.

Step 2: Understand the menstruation in the statement

After having understood what I need to await for (from Step one), I now read carefully the given paragraph. Hither, we use all the principles of Agile Reading and try to sympathize the logical flow that the writer has used in the statement. For example, the following could be a representation of the given statement.

The argument concludes that because of improved treatment methods, diabetic patients are able to now alive longer after contracting the disease.

Step 3:

This is the most important step where almost of the thought process is involved. The question is asking for an supposition in the argument. An assumption is that statement that the author would have taken for granted to link the reason to the decision. Information technology is the ground on which the argument relies. In other words, if the supposition is faux, the statement would plummet. That means the given reason would not exit to the given conclusion. And then, when a question asks for an supposition, nosotros can approach it in 2 ways.

Method 1: Ask the right questions

Ask which of the given options is necessary for the statement to stand. Alternately, ask which of the given options, if Non TRUE, would make the statement plummet.

In the current argument, the increase in the number of years of life is attributed to improved treatment methods. No other reason is assumed equally a cause other than the treatment methods.

Method 2: compare the terms between reasoning and conclusion

Compare the terms between the reason and the decision. Bank check where the discrepancies are. If the argument must concur footing, and then the dissimilar terms are being treated as same and that would be the underlying assumption.

In the current argument, the term "patients subsequently detection" and "patients after contracting" are beingness compared. That shows that if the given reason must support the given conclusion, both these terms have to be similar. In other words, the argument assumes these to be the same.

Step 4: Respond by emptying

This is the stride where I go through each of the options given, and eliminate the incorrect ones by evaluating them confronting what I demand. I need a statement that makes the two to a higher place mentioned terms like. The first choice brings in a new term "patients who received the treatment". This is not related to either of the terms discussed earlier. A new element of information is being introduced and hence this cannot exist the supposition. The 2d one likewise talks most the patients being treated and hence can be eliminated.

The third option mentions that the detection of the disease is NOT before than it was in the 1980s. In other words, it is indicating that because there is no alter in when the disease is being detected in the patients, the 15 years increase is considering the patients were living longer due to improved handling methods.

To elaborate, if the disease is now being detected earlier, then the 15 years increase might be because of not the treatment methods and patients might all the same exist living for the aforementioned periods of time. Thus, this statement becomes the linchpin for the statement.

Annals for GRE Online Classes

In the next commodity, we shall wait at a few more than Disquisitional Reasoning questions and the approaches to solving them.

GRE Disquisitional Reasoning - Strengthen/Weaken based Questions

GRE Disquisitional Reasoning - Flaw based Questions

GRE Critical Reasoning - Paradox based Questions

GRE Disquisitional Reasoning - Method of Reasoning based Question

 Check Other Blogs for GRE Grooming

• GRE- Test blueprint and Syllabus

• GRE- Eligibility and Registration

• GRE- Retaking it and FAQs

• GRE- five Preparation Tips for Beginners

• GRE- What are Scores and Percentiles?

• GRE Critical Reasoning Questions

overstreetwidee1972.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.conduiraonline.com/index.php/detail/2202-gre-rc-critical-reasoning-question-answer-steps-to-solve

Share this post